Really interesting discussion ...

... on ID in the UK. 142 comments so far - respect! Much of the usual anti-ID claptrap - for example, from Tony Jackson, a Cambridge lecturer, who thinks that the subsidiary questions:

1)Who is the Designer?

2)Where did s/he/it come from?

3)Is there just one designer or are there many?

4)How did the Designer do the designing?

5)When did the Designer do the designing?

6)Is the Designer still designing or has s/he/it retired?

represent a refutation of the concept of Intelligent Design. No doubt he also thinks that Stonehenge is a natural arrangement of rocks, pending somebody telling him the name of the site foreman.